| |
Originally published in The
Industry Standard, May 24, 1999
How to Name Your Net Play
By Jacob Ward
You want your company name to be GarageDoorOpeners.com?
Get in line.
In 10 years, your company name will be passe. That intercap-ridden,
OutToGoPublic.com name you registered with Internic last week
is going to make you look bad - "The putting-the-capital-in-the-middle
thing was trendy at first, but now it dates you," says one
naming consultant. And if you thought you were clever to lock
up a category name as your URL, just wait for the lawsuit
headaches you'll have when four other companies begin to compete
with you.
Naming a company seems like it should be easy: Get some
friends together and brainstorm yourself a brand. But most
companies end up paying a consultant tens of thousands of
dollars to conduct consumer recall studies, pull teeth at
the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to register the name
as a trademark and (an added hassle particular to Web companies)
hunt through Internic for an available URL.
Even then, sometimes the company wants to start over. Each
week, it seems, another Internet company changes its name,
sacrificing millions of dollars in branding to be called something
else. Last week, the Mining Company renamed itself About.com
and acquired 3,000 other domains (aboutkids.com, aboutpregnancy.com)
to lead users to the site.
Darrell Hayden, president of strategic identity-development
company Hayden Group, which charges between $15,000 and $20,000
to find a suitable name and corresponding URL, says that his
Internet clients often don't realize that it takes more than
a domain name. "I've been in meetings with clients where they
check Internic and pick one - 'Alpha.com looks available!'"
says Hayden. "And we have to tell them that it's not necessarily
available in the real world. And they say, 'Oh yeah, right.'"
Barbara Heinrich, VP of marketing at iOwn.com, which last
month changed its name from HomeShark.com ("We found the name
had different connotations for different people," she explains),
says finding a name was surprisingly difficult. Using Lexicon
Branding, a brand-development company, she says, "We cut it
down from 3,000 names to 85. After figuring out what's a clean
trademark and what URL you can get - only then can you do
the focus group."
The URL alone can cost $10,000 or more if it's owned by
a greedy prospector; hiring an attorney to check out your
Top 10 list can run $1,000 per name. To keep it cheap, About.com
created a fake company name to do the domain-name acquisitions.
"If we, as a public company with $80 million in the bank,
want to buy a name, the price is going to be ridiculous,"
says Scott Kurnit,
chairman and CEO of About.com.
The company name is the first line of defense against the
competition. But right now, the fashion in Web-related names
runs contrary to legal wisdom. In the real world, trademark
and patent lawyers advise their clients to establish a wide
defensive perimeter around their names by choosing ones that
are (in legal terms) descriptive, suggestive and, most important,
fanciful. A fanciful name differentiates a brand from its
competitors. Clorox, Kodak and Xerox (XRX),
for example, are powerful brand names with no prior associations
in a consumer's mind.
The intoxicating "first-mover" temptations of the Internet,
however, have driven many people to choose plainly descriptive
category names - often before a company has even been assembled.
"We bought the URL before we had the business plan, to be
quite honest," says Tracy Randall, VP of e-commerce at Cooking.com.
But to be memorable, a name shouldn't be generic. "Someone
with an abstract name, provided it's loaded with positive,
mysterious, exotic images, has a more efficient engine for
building brand," says J. David Placek, CEO of Lexicon, which
charges Internet startups $40,000 to $50,000 to find a name
and a URL. Already, some Internet companies are discovering
the problems of not having established that defensive perimeter.
SpringStreet, an online apartment-finding service, recently
changed its name from AllApartments.com. "I come out of the
packaged goods business," explains Sophia Kabler, SpringStreet's
VP of marketing. "You're supposed to make words mean something
over time." And having such a generic name turned out to be
possibly damaging in a world in which the 30 minutes between
seeing a billboard and getting to a computer might mean handing
business to Apartments.com or Rent.Net. In the end, says Kabler,
"We didn't want to be confused with our competition."
Bernhard Warner contributed to this story.
copyright © 2010 Jacob Ward All
Rights Reserved
|